English 
Tiếng ViệtConfirm QKD or QRNG use case
PQC-versus-QKD decision framework
QKD · KEY PROTECTION PRODUCT / SOLUTION PROFILE
QKD / QRNG Integration Track
Research / partner track
Assess partner-based integration of quantum key distribution or quantum random sources where the use case justifies it.
CUSTOMER PROBLEM
Assess partner-based integration of quantum key distribution or quantum random sources where the use case justifies it.
QKD and QRNG are not universal replacements for PQC. They require a justified use case, partner infrastructure, protected interfaces and a clear trust boundary.
Research / partner track
- Portfolio class
- Key protection product / solution profile
- Public profile
- 2026.07
- Version rule
- Confirmed in quotation / release record
PRODUCT-SPECIFIC IMPLEMENTATION FLOW
How QKD / QRNG Integration Track operates from input to evidence.
QKD networks, QRNG devices, HSM/KMS and standards-aligned connectors when available. Research note, partner scope, threat model and pilot acceptance criteria.
Select partner interface and topology
QKD KME/SAE and HSM/KMS connector design
Bind QKD/QRNG to KMS or HSM
QRNG health and consumption model
Apply availability and fallback policy
High-availability and denial-of-service analysis
Test synchronization and failure
Partner interoperability and responsibility matrix
Approve research-to-pilot gate
Research-to-pilot acceptance gate
NAMED COMPONENTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
What QKD / QRNG Integration Track contains and what each component does.
The descriptions below state concrete technical behaviour rather than generic support language.
PQC-versus-QKD decision framework
Compares PQC, QKD and classical controls against distance, availability, key-consumption rate, threat model and operating cost before selecting a technology.
QKD KME/SAE and HSM/KMS connector design
Defines KME/SAE, HSM or KMS connector boundaries, authentication, key identifiers and responsibility between Mobile-ID, customer and QKD partner.
QRNG health and consumption model
Specifies how QRNG output is health-tested, conditioned, consumed and monitored without implying that entropy integration alone provides quantum-safe security.
High-availability and denial-of-service analysis
Models key-pool exhaustion, link loss, denial-of-service, site failover and approved fallback to PQC or pre-shared-key profiles.
Partner interoperability and responsibility matrix
Tests cross-site key synchronization, identifier matching, deletion, renewal and error handling with exact partner versions and topology.
Research-to-pilot acceptance gate
Requires a signed research note, threat model, interoperability report and measurable acceptance criteria before any capability is presented as a pilot.
- PQC-versus-QKD decision
- Connector and trust-boundary design
- Partner interoperability plan
QKD networks, QRNG devices, HSM/KMS and standards-aligned connectors when available.
Customer security boundary
HSM, QSCD, token or KMS components remain in the customer-controlled environment with documented ceremonies.
Dedicated high-availability service
Protected key services run across approved HA/DR nodes with tested quorum, backup and recovery.
Integrated managed operation
Operational responsibility is divided explicitly across customer, Mobile-ID and hardware/technology partners.
- Research note, partner scope, threat model and pilot acceptance criteria.
- Version and configuration manifest for: QKD networks, QRNG devices, HSM/KMS and standards-aligned connectors when available.
- Negative, failure and recovery tests for “Test synchronization and failure” and “Approve research-to-pilot gate”.
- Signed acceptance record, accountable owner, published limitations and next review date.
STANDARDS & PROFILES
- ETSI GS QKD 014
- RFC 8784 PPK concepts
- PKCS#11
- Partner-specific QKD / QRNG interfaces
PRODUCT-SPECIFIC BOUNDARIES
Conditions that must remain true for QKD / QRNG Integration Track.
These points come from the product profile, not from a shared disclaimer.
NEXT STEP
Discuss research collaboration: QKD / QRNG Integration Track
Agree the research question, partner scope, evidence and pilot threshold.